Work was very interesting this past week with all the
casework I went through. One particular case was very bizarre. Since I can’t
share the real names of the patients we analyze, I’m going to refer to this
patient as Emily Rose. Emily was to be discharged from the Southern California
Mental Institute but before a patient can be cleared they must be evaluated by
“The Board”. The Board is a team of psychologists, including myself, that
carefully analyze patients coming in and out of the institution.
Usually I tend to go through the motions of work and remain
unattached to cases, but there was something about this one, about Emily, that
stuck to me, like glue. She was an elderly woman, a frail soul at that, living
in solitude for many decades in a home where only her housekeepers visited. I
felt great sorrow for Emily, and now it was my job to either make her stay
alone in this institution or send her back home where she had no family. I
couldn’t allow myself to get caught up in personal feelings that would get in
the way of the heated discussion that awaited me in the board meeting that
afternoon.
I looked at the notes that I had jotted down from my
personal time with Emily and I remembered how the subject of “death” was
heavily on her mind. Emily had been put in this institution because of how she
hid dead bodies in her home. If that doesn’t sound crazy enough, there was even
evidence that showed she may have poisoned one of the deceased, but it had not
been proven at the time. When I was talking to her I watched her responses. She
was very soft-spoken, giving me very vague answers, almost as if she couldn’t
answer my simple questions. Not only that but I could have sworn I heard
whispers, as if she had to self-check herself before and after each response.
After Emily had been analyze and her behaviors were
recorded, now all that was left was to debate on the case. I had already came
to a conclusion that she still had issues and definitely needed more time in
Southern California Institution. We pulled her medical records and the fact
that she had been previously diagnosed with schizophrenia didn’t aid her
chances. Dr. Winchester suggested that the disease could have led to the fact
she lived alone and hid the bodies from her town.
After about a half-hour of discussion my panel finally came
to a conclusion, Emily was not ready to go home. Her medical history could have
led to her strange behavior and it could be a danger to not only herself, but
to the public if we allowed her to leave the facility. Not only that but the
fact that she was already very elderly led to the outcome also. Even though I
felt that the right decision was made for Ms. Rose I couldn’t help but still
feel horrible about the entire case. Did I feel a connection with this woman
because I too was once alone, having been adopted into a home? Either way, I
plan to visit Emily from now on in her final years. She could really use a
friend, and I think that’s one thing she missed out on in her life.
Very god post Miss Vega! I had no trouble reading the whole post. You are right in saying that she needed a friend.
ReplyDeleteThis was definitely an interesting case, Ms. Vega. I believe we have made the right choice by keeping "Rose" within the system.
ReplyDeleteWhat is Emily's final diagnosis?
ReplyDeleteI'm glad to know that Ms. Emily will now have a friend in her final years. I was curious to which specific type of schizophrenia Ms. Emily had though, and why death weighed heavily on her mind.
ReplyDelete